Thursday 12 April 2012

Life from Scratch, Almost

Over recent decades there have been many advances in our understanding of genomes. The sequencing of whole genomes was of particular importance. The first full sequence was achieved in 1977 of a phage virus followed 18 years later by the first bacterium, Haemophilus influenzae. Thousands of whole microbial genomes now exist and has enabled advances in techniques like metagenomics and biotechnology.

Perhaps the most controversial study was carried out by Gibson et al (2010) where the creation of an artificial bacterium had been achieved. It got a lot of coverage in the news and as well as a lot of criticism, ‘playing God’ was a term used a lot. This team managed to insert a 1.08 Mbp man made genome into a Mycoplasma capricolum recipient cell. This article does not have the conventional layout but is basically a large Methods section explaining how the cell was produced.

To start with, the artificial genome was based on another species of Mycoplasma (M. mycoides). As this was very experimental procedure these two species were used because of their relatively small genomes. Synthetic genome assembly was done in a number of stages. First step involved a computer and an oligonucleotide synthesizer to produce small DNA segments, 109 of these were joined together to produce 1080-bp long sections. It was very important that these were in the correct sequence in accordance with the M. mycoides genome and this was constantly checked. The following steps involved the gradual build up of the full genome from smaller sections in yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The final chromosome was pieced together from 11 100-kb fragments. The final step was to transplant the entire genome from the yeast to the M. capricolum cells. It was important to switch off any restriction enzymes before hand as they could cleave any foreign DNA. During synthesis of the genome, a number of ‘watermark’ genes were additionally added to confirm that the cells contained the new synthetic genome. One of these watermarks was for proteins that convert X-gal (in the agar plates) into a blue compound. Wild type M. capricolum lack these genes which helped to isolate cells that contained the cloned DNA. The cells were found to be self-sustaining and replicate.

Although this is not strictly marine microbiology, I chose to review it because one of the researchers involved with the project was J. Craig Venter who has become famous for his work on the Global Ocean Survey where thousands of microbial genes are being identified with his whole genome shotgun sequencing technique. With an entire manmade genome having been successfully inserted into a cell it seems certain that highly specialised cells can be made to order for biotechnology. No doubt some of the genes J. Craig Venter has identified will become a major player in producing products like biofuels and pharmaceuticals.

I have only given a very, very brief over view of the technique used in this study, mainly because it is fairly complex but very interesting all the same. The controversy behind it also add an interesting angle to it, if not slightly amusing.

A Review of:
Gibson D, Glass J, Lartigue C, Noskov V, Chuang R, Algire M, Benders G, Montague M, Ma L, Moodie M, Merryman C, Vashee S, Krishnakumar R, Assad-Garcia N, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova E, Young L, Qi Z, Segall-Shapiro T, Calvey C, Parmar P, Hutchison C, Smith H and Venter J (2010) Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome. Science. 329: 52-58.

6 comments:

Samantha Bowgen said...

Hey Lee,
Interesting review. It's pretty impressive scientific progress, if a little daunting!

I was wondering if you knew why they chose to use that specific species of yeast - Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

Also, has there been any kick back about the potential misuse of such synthetic biology for bioterrorism?

Corin Liddle said...

Hey, Guys yes I read that paper when it cam out! It was interesting, according to some sources J.Craig and his teams had their names encrypted into the genome sequence using a code, helpful I guess if your an alien and have the key to decipher the code. I would be interested to know what the proposed future is for synthetic genomes.

Lee Hutt said...

Hi Sami, good questions.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used (I think) because it is a very well studied eukaryotic cell, the E. coli of the yeast world. When it came to the recombination of DNA fragments it was important to use a well known species., being physically bigger than the Mycoplasmas helps also.

Regarding the concerns over such organisms, according to an interview Venter gave the team approached the Bush administration before they published any of their previous work. Federal agents were then involed in policeing what they were doing. Sounds fair enough but I think there is always going to be concerns with this area. I guess if more labs were to also produce man made genomes then policeing will become very difficult.

Lee Hutt said...

Hi Corin

I have not heard of that one, I would love to know what code they used something really nerdy I bet. Regarding the future of synthetic genomes I think the idea is to build genes based ones found in nature and to turn cells into little factories for things like biofuels and medicine. There are examples of this being done already, insulin for diabetics come from genetically modified E. coli containing the cloned human insulin gene. However there are many limitations in doing this but starting from scratch should get around these and possible more productive.

Corin Liddle said...

Ah yep, insulin, yes I heard that before. I think they have also produced tryptophan via similar methods as a sleep inducer and antidepressant. In some cases when sp. have been G.M. toxic forms of the targeted product have also been expressed i.e. isomers of a desired product. This has caused problems for drug companies in the past, however it has been difficult to prove it was the drug companies fault. If the genome was engineered perhaps it would guarantee only the production of the desired product being produced.

Lee Hutt said...

Yes exactly! I think they want complete control on what is produced. I do not think it was produced from bacteria but thalidomide is a infamous example of what happens when a percentage of a product exists in an alternative isomer. Maybe cases like that can now be avoided. There is always going to be criticism for this area of research I imagine. Films like I Am Legend do not help. Still a good film though.